Random I-Tunes Song of The Moment: Long Live Rock 'n' Roll by Rainbow

James Brown Hide and Seek Review

One DVD, one concept, seven-ish effects and $30 bucks. Is it gem or is it rubble? Stay tuned to find out.

Effect/Method

What you're learning for $30 bucks is a no palm method to load anything into your inside your wallet in your inside coat pocket. That is, anything that can fit in your wallet. This allows you to do several effects that just seem impossible. For example, the spectator thinks of a poker hand (yes . . . thinks). Your hands very clearly are empty as they reach in and pull out your wallet. Inside the wallet is the thought of poker hand.

There's also an effect where you borrow the spectator's iPhone. While the phone is still in full view, you hand her your wallet. The phone is still in view. Then it vanishes instantly. Someone calls her number and the wallet she's holding (your wallet) vibrates and rings. She reaches inside and finds her wallet in the zippered compartment.

There are several different effects that are just as impossible that are taught on the DVD. It's also the kind of thing that will inspire you to create more ideas of your own. The method is extremely simple both in concept and execution. It's very much within the grasp of any skill level. It will definitely take some practice to get the timing and rhythm down, but it's very doable.

The only consideration for the method is that you must be wearing a suit jacket with two buttons buttoned up. Also, it cannot be a double breasted suit, and if the suit coat is a loose fit, it will not work. Also, you'll need a load wallet if you're going to be doing the item-to-wallet effects. However, James Brown mentions that many of the effects can be done just simply to your inner pocket rather than to your wallet. Of course, the above mentioned iPhone effect must use a load wallet . . . one that can fit an iPhone. He recommends the ATW Wallet from RSVP. That's $127 bucks. Any Kaps/Checkbook style load wallet should suffice, however.

If you wear a buttoned suit coat that fits snugly and you have a load wallet, you can do an entire shift of strolling magic with no other props. Add a deck of cards and some cash and your business cards, and you'll have tons of material to perform.

Ad Copy Integrity

The ad copy is accurate and totally legitimate. The only thing that, I think, is worth mentioning is the claim that "No gimmick or device is used to accomplish any of the routines." This is true. However, you do need a load wallet which is, technically, a device and/or gimmick. However, the reason I'm being a bit lenient here is because, based on the context, I think that they're talking about the fact that you don't have/need some weird gimmick that gets the card/phone/whatever into the wallet. In that sense, there truly are no gimmicks or devices. As I mentioned earlier, if you have your load wallet and a buttoned up suit coat, you're all set.

Product Quality

The DVD is well produced, well lit, well shot, etc. For the most part, it's easy to navigate. However, the main menu several pages (i.e., clicks) deep, and there is no main menu or back button on the sub pages. That's a bit frustrating. There is an included PDF file that is one page long listing a few credits. However, they forgot to put the .pdf extension on it. So when you download it off of the DVD, rename it and add the extension .pdf to it.

The teaching was very good. He covered the concepts and the effects extremely well in great depth, but not too much depth . . . Goldilocks was very happy. There were, however, a few things that he missed in teaching segment.

First, on one of the effects, based on the technique and structure, the odds are overwhelmingly in your favor that the effect will go a certain way. However, he mentions that if it doesn't, "don't worry; there is an out that we'll be going over in a minute." However, he never covers the out. Also on that same effect, he covers an alternate method for doing it which requires a peek. He performed the peek, but did not show us how it was done. I can kind of let that slide, however, because he covered it in a later effect.

The second thing is a bit more minor in nature. The method for the iPhone ending up in the wallet that the spectator is holding is done with no gimmicks whatsoever (other than the wallet itself). However, he mentions an alternative method which uses "fake iPhones." However, he does not tell use what a fake iPhone is or where to get it/them.

The last one was during the explanation of the book test. During the explanation, he was showing/teaching to his in-studio friend. He was showing us how to get the peek. However, he had a situation where the in-studio person said "stop" on a page that had an image on it. Rather than showing us how he would handle that in a real performance, he stopped the explanation and started the trick over. I felt that this was, obviously, a real thing that might happen in a real performance that warranted at least a brief discussion.

Everything else is solid.

Final Thoughts

This product/technique/etc. is excellent and very clever, and can be a huge and powerful addition to your arsenal. It actually has some similarities to my S.S. Vanish taught on my Gemstones DVD, so if you're familiar with that, you'll possibly see a bit how this works. The big advantage to James Brown's method is that you can easily retrieve the objects for reuse, whereas the S.S. Vanish is meant only for complete vanishes or secret switches.

As always, performance "problems" are not counted against the final star rating. However, as usual, I do mention them for two reasons: 1) a warning to you not to pick up any bad habits, and 2) in the hopes that James Brown will see this and realize that he's doing some things that he may not be aware of. These two problems I'm about to mention are very common amongst the magi. In fact, yesterday's review of Tom Wright's Stand Up Magic mentions these exact same problems.

Meaningless Ramblings

The following is a list of quotes from the performance segments:

"Do me a favor . . . What's your name?"

"Do me a favor . . . do me a favor . . ." Followed by nothing. He says it twice then does not ask the spectator to do anything.

"Excellent Stuff . . ." A phrase that is said when a card is signed, or selected or whatever, for no reason.

"Tellyawu." A rushed, slurred together version of "Tell you what." He didn't say this as often as many performers I've heard, however, once is too much.

Spectator Abuse

I know that "abuse" is a strong word, but I really believe that these things to follow fit in that category. Here are more quotes:

"Do you have a bank card?" The spectator says, "Yes." He repeats, "Do you have a bank card?" Where's the abuse? He's, obviously, not paying attention to them or what they say.

After a card was selected, "Are you happy?" Before they answer, he's cut them off and moved on to the next part of the routine. Abuse: Not listening. Talking over them.

Last, but worst, was the abuse of treating spectator's like prop managers: "Here take this, hold that, put the lid back on the pen, give me that, let me have this, put this over here." Abuse: Bossing the spectator's around. Not connecting with your spectators. Being pushy.

Wrap Up

As mentioned, these points don't impact the star rating whatsoever, but please (a word James Brown should have used when he told the spectator to recap the pen) do not pick up these bad habits. And James, my brother, if you're watching, please (there's that word again), don't take this as an insult, but rather as a bit of feedback on your performance that hopefully will further improve and polish the performance side of your amazing magic.

Final Verdict:
4.5 Stars with a Stone Status of Gem.

10 Comments

  • billy benbo says:

    A very useful insight into the practicality, and more important, presentation, of what is a real asset to the correctly dressed performer. The review gets 5 stars with no “stone” un-turned.Thanks Jeff.

  • Steve Black says:

    I found your ‘Meaningless Ramblings’ ‘Spectator Abuse’ and Wrap Up’ sections of this review both unnecessary and crass. It is arrogance of the highest order.A great deal of the phraseology in this video and Tom Wright’s are local colloquialisms which you obviously find irritating but are, however,normal in the UK.As you say performance ‘problems’ do not count in the final star rating or alter the practicality of the methodology but ,hey, its a good you can spare the to make us all better people.Thank you sooooooooooooo much!!

    • Jeff Stone says:

      @Steve – Thanks for the comment. The UK does not have a corner on those phrases. They’re everywhere here in the States too. It’s not the phrases I have a problem with. It’s the fact that they are fillers because the performer doesn’t know what to say. Which means that more preparation and scripting is in order. James Brown actually agreed with my assessment and said so on my Facebook page.

      Also, I’m including myself in this. I need to work on them as well. Further, all performers, no matter who they are need to improve. Though my advice was unsolicited, it is solid advice that anyone with theater training, voice training, script training and/or performance coaching would agree with. I’m honestly just trying to help. I’m sorry if that bothers you. I truly am. I’m not sure if you watched the video too, but my sincerity and real intent is very clear in the video.

      Lastly, are you okay with performers talking over and ignoring spectators as well as bossing them around? I’m genuinely asking. I’m not being flippant. Some performers have no problem with that. In my opinion — and that’s all it is, my opinion — it’s rude and abusive to people. We, as a society (UK and USA and Most other places in the world) teach our children to be polite and treat people with respect. Ignoring people and bossing them around is the opposite of respect.

      Anyway, I really do appreciate the feedback. I always enjoy hearing differing opinions, so thank you for your post. Keep the comments coming; they keep the site more interesting and more valuable to see other views beside just mine.

      I would ask one thing, however, and that is to keep it civil. I try to keep this site free from snarky comments and negative sarcasm. I have no problem with calling me out and/or disagreeing with me, but I would appreciate a bit more civility. Thanks for understanding.

      Jeffro

  • billy benbo says:

    “a warning to you not to pick up any bad habits, and 2) in the hopes that James Brown will see this and realize that he’s doing some things that he may not be aware of. These two problems I’m about to mention are very common amongst the magi”.

    The quote from above text is a general one and valid one.I dont see that as a personal attack on any individual but more pointers on what to avoid.

  • Grandpa Chet Cox says:

    I was going to complement your tact in pointing out how audience management skills are sorely needed by close-up performers – a concern with which stage performers rarely deal. You saw me mention this earlier in a response to another review. It’s hard medicine to swallow, but every performer (magician, actor, ANY performer) needs direction. If one can spring for a director’s afternoon, it pays HUGE dividends.

    But that was before I discovered such advice hurts Steve Black’s feelings, so never mind.

  • Rob Butcher says:

    I think this review was spot on with a major issue of magic – folks practice the routines but are too lazy to script their responses.This has little to do with UK colloquisms (I’m from the UK myself) but more to do with some-one not doing the required prep.

    Clearly, this is a routine for an existing prop. I welcomed that being pointed out. My own card to wallet wouldn’t work with this method.

    • Jeff Stone says:

      @Rob – Thanks for the comment. I agree. Scripting is critical. Regarding “existing prop,” I’m not sure what you’re referring to. There is no prop used here, no gimmick, etc.

  • Rob Butcher says:

    by prop, I’m referring to the wallet – without that there is no trick

  • Chris Bailey says:

    Hi Jeff

    I just wanted to quickly thank you for your ramblings and abuse sections. I can’t remember seeing this before and I think I an help all of us, amateur AND pro, to be better performers.

    Best,
    Chris

  • miggy says:

    It is true. I have been approached by street magicians that basically have become nuisances here in the big apple. Some of them have no idea to talk to people correctly and are disrespectful. If that’s the part of the act, they can have it. That’s why 99 percent of them will always stays as gutter magicians and the class acts move on to bigger and better things than nickel and dime magic rehashed and repackaged magic crap.

Your email address will not be published.

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.